"Here's another interesting tip that I picked up at Max Gardner's Bankruptcy Boot Camp back in August.
"Consider giving each of your debtor clients a cheap tape recorder that they can use to record calls from debt collectors, establish violations claims, and ultimately build better cases in courts.
"While the automatic stay prevents creditors and debt collectors from contacting a bankruptcy petitioner during his or her case, we know firsthand how collectors will often circumvent this court order and try to intimidate our clients.
"By giving tape recorders to our debtor clients, we may help them capture some of these possible violations and maybe even get them some money as a result of harassing creditors.
"Of course, when giving a debtor a tape recorder, you will need to go over some important ground rules with them:
"By getting your clients to understand the potential value of recording illegal phone calls from debt collectors and ensuring that they understand state recording rules and what they must to do, you may go a long way in making their bankruptcy cases even more worthwhile."
- Kevin Chern
President, Start Fresh Today
The U.S. Trustee Program made 1,163 bankruptcy-related criminal referrals in fiscal year (FY) 2007—an increase of 25.7 percent over similar referrals made in FY 2006, according to an Executive Office for U.S. Trustees report.
Last year the most common charges were bankruptcy filers making false oaths or statements (46.9 percent) or concealing their assets (41.5 percent). Bankruptcy fraud schemes (23.6 percent), perjury or false statements (23.3 percent) and identity theft matters (16.8 percent) were the other allegations listed in the report.
This report serves as an important reminder to us attorneys—we have a responsibility to consult our clients to use full disclosure when they file bankruptcy. For more information, view the full report here.
Here's a roundup of some important statistics to glance at since our last newsletter:
Start Fresh Today President Kevin Chern can help you get a "preferred tuition" discount of 15 percent for Morgan King's Bankruptcy Academy on discharging taxes, taking place on October 31 and November 1 in Boston, Massachusetts.
Here's how:
Other bankruptcy-related events of interest during the next couple of months include:
Are we missing anything on this list?
Let us know by shooting us an email to newsletters@startfreshtoday.com with any upcoming consumer-related bankruptcy events.
Did you know that you can pay in advance for a set amount of our packages, courses and/or due diligence items with our Prepay Functionality Program rather than having to pay each time you set up a new client?
For example, let's say that you have around 30 clients a month. With the Prepay Functionality Program, you could prepay for 50 packages at a time for the month, thus allowing your clients to self-register without paying any fees or giving you the ability to set up your client at your office without having to pay at the moment.
Here's how the program works:
To learn more about our Prepay Functionality Program, check out the following letter.
If you're ready to participate, fill out the form above.
If you have any questions or want more information about participating in this program, please contact Rori Endick at 954-377-9051.
In relation to the SFT Prepay Functionality Program, you can learn more about how our products can help you satisfy your BAPCPA needs by scheduling a free demonstration.
All you have to do is fill out our quick and easy "Demo Request" form and choose a time that works best for you.
Reserve your space(s) today!
Please note that the U.S. Trustee Program will apply updated family income data to all bankruptcy case filings as of October 1, 2008.
Supplied by the U.S. Census Bureau, the new income data will be used to complete Bankruptcy Forms 22A and 22C for compliance with the "means test" requirement when determining Chapter 7 eligibility.
To review the new income data, see the chart below.
| Census Bureau Median Family Income By Family Size | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STATE | 1 PERSON | 2 PEOPLE | 3 PEOPLE | 4 PEOPLE* |
| Alabama | $35,507 | $44,922 | $51,130 | $61,586 |
| Alaska | $47,501 | $68,904 | $69,414 | $88,361 |
| Arizona | $41,792 | $55,489 | $59,709 | $69,210 |
| Arkansas | $32,380 | $43,755 | $47,101 | $54,721 |
| California | $47,363 | $62,690 | $68,070 | $77,014 |
| Colorado | $45,036 | $63,240 | $68,219 | $75,987 |
| Connecticut | $55,379 | $68,208 | $82,160 | $99,584 |
| Delaware | $44,479 | $58,501 | $74,320 | $76,085 |
| District of Columbia | $40,774 | $70,035 | $70,035 | $70,035 |
| Florida | $40,898 | $51,945 | $57,937 | $68,494 |
| Georgia | $39,253 | $52,055 | $59,668 | $68,908 |
| Hawaii | $50,832 | $63,778 | $70,481 | $85,577 |
| Idaho | $39,397 | $50,025 | $52,613 | $64,464 |
| Illinois | $45,604 | $57,829 | $66,189 | $78,182 |
| Indiana | $40,155 | $51,203 | $58,902 | $67,911 |
| Iowa | $39,851 | $52,608 | $61,526 | $71,309 |
| Kansas | $39,488 | $54,070 | $60,906 | $71,867 |
| Kentucky | $35,274 | $43,793 | $53,343 | $63,097 |
| Louisiana | $35,579 | $45,013 | $50,682 | $64,170 |
| Maine | $39,116 | $50,140 | $61,963 | $67,136 |
| Maryland | $53,489 | $71,213 | $81,811 | $99,884 |
| Massachusetts | $52,814 | $63,980 | $80,031 | $96,572 |
| Michigan | $43,050 | $51,594 | $60,997 | $73,490 |
| Minnesota | $45,832 | $59,778 | $72,808 | $84,394 |
| Mississippi | $31,152 | $40,383 | $44,752 | $53,697 |
| Missouri | $38,100 | $49,704 | $56,311 | $67,761 |
| Montana | $38,024 | $50,844 | $50,844 | $62,765 |
| Nebraska | $36,405 | $51,477 | $60,491 | $69,510 |
| Nevada | $46,412 | $58,318 | $63,351 | $71,972 |
| New Hampshire | $53,704 | $63,320 | $74,161 | $89,740 |
| New Jersey | $55,008 | $67,270 | $82,239 | $99,224 |
| New Mexico | $34,585 | $46,907 | $51,058 | $53,938 |
| New York | $44,803 | $54,898 | $65,477 | $79,966 |
| North Carolina | $37,055 | $50,419 | $55,182 | $67,541 |
| North Dakota | $36,813 | $51,415 | $65,143 | $69,098 |
| Ohio | $40,888 | $50,965 | $59,949 | $71,489 |
| Oklahoma | $36,830 | $49,424 | $52,479 | $59,755 |
| Oregon | $43,506 | $54,235 | $58,789 | $70,046 |
| Pennsylvania | $43,036 | $51,051 | $64,775 | $75,867 |
| Rhode Island | $44,748 | $57,121 | $70,117 | $88,035 |
| South Carolina | $37,296 | $48,944 | $52,806 | $63,535 |
| South Dakota | $34,219 | $49,180 | $55,985 | $66,451 |
| Tennessee | $36,308 | $46,927 | $53,149 | $62,226 |
| Texas | $37,120 | $52,878 | $54,943 | $63,945 |
| Utah | $47,026 | $54,715 | $61,437 | $69,260 |
| Vermont | $39,365 | $56,318 | $61,934 | $73,130 |
| Virginia | $47,852 | $62,926 | $70,485 | $82,598 |
| Washington | $48,783 | $61,172 | $67,004 | $79,397 |
| West Virginia | $37,275 | $41,280 | $49,111 | $57,552 |
| Wisconsin | $41,233 | $55,525 | $64,622 | $74,885 |
| Wyoming | $44,554 | $58,207 | $66,033 | $77,432 |
| *Add $6,900 for each individual in excess of 4 | ||||
Source: U.S. Trustee Program
In comparison to the median income data for Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases filed between March 17, 2008, and September 30, 2008, here are some interesting tidbits about the new data.
As the myths surrounding the means test are corrected, experts are predicting that there will be an increase in the number of bankruptcy filings.
A St. Louis-based federal appeals court ruled that a BAPCPA provision was unconstitutional as it applied to attorneys.
The provision stated that debt relief agencies were prohibited from counseling their clients on accumulating additional debt. At issue was whether attorneys were considered "debt relief agencies."
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that attorneys were indeed considered "debt relief agencies;" however, the provision was unconstitutional when applied to attorneys because it violated their right to free speech and prevented them from wholly counseling their clients.
The ruling stated, "There are certain situations where it would likely be in the assisted person's, and even the creditors', best interest for the assisted person to incur additional debt in contemplation of bankruptcy."
The court gave the examples of a person who may need to purchase a car to get to their job or someone who could get a lower interest rate if they applied for refinancing.
Although similar challenges to BAPCPA are making their way through lower courts, the ruling is the first of its kind from a federal appeals court. Of course, this ruling only applies to the Eighth Circuit area.
It's expected that this issue will be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court.
For more information, see the following article: